OpenServicesEuropeanRestricted
Tender for architect selection for the reconstruction of Twents Carmel College, Oldenzaal
Stichting Carmelcollege · Restricted · 1 lots · 422016
6
6 of 6 core insights found
Measures presence, not accuracy · documents remain authoritative
ScopeAdvicePoints of attentionSuitability requirementsAward criteriaTimeline
Type
Services
71000000 · Architecture, civil en
Estimated value
Not published
To deadline
-24d
May 22, 2026 · 23:59
Knock-outs
1
exclusion grounds
Award basis
Best price-quality ratio
6 criteria
Assess manuallyconfidence high
Architect selection for the reconstruction, revitalization, and new construction of the Twents Carmel College in Oldenzaal, consisting of a two-phase procedure where quality is heavily weighted.
Services · Restricted · European procedure
European1 exclusion groundsComplete timeline
CharacteristicsCPV 71ServicesEU tenderreconstructioneducational locationarchitect selection
01What is being requested
Architectural and technical design for the reconstruction, revitalization and new construction of the Lyceumstraat educational location in Oldenzaal. The assignment includes a total space program of approximately 9,700 m2 GFA and an outdoor space of 5,515 m2 GFA, including aesthetic guidance and coordination of disciplines.
The current location is technically and functionally outdated and urgently requires replacement. The task concerns integration into the existing situation.
1Lot 1: Architect selection—
02Strategic insight
Strategic insight · AI analysis
Focus during selection on demonstrating relevant experience with both large-scale utility construction as well as specific educational and sports functions. Ensure a high-quality BIM process that directly complies with the ILS v2.0 requirements, as this is a knock-out criterion in the second phase. Prepare a vision presentation that emphasizes functional design, cost-consciousness, and sustainability, as these together constitute 50% of the quality weighting.
03Points of attention
Important · 6
Integration loss of approximately 11% must be included in the space program.Important
Monument status of the building part from 1925 requires a well-thought-out design for the revitalization.Important
BIM model must comply with the BIM basis ILS v2.0 and will be assessed on a knock-out basis.Important
Vision presentation must explicitly not contain detailed designs or scale models.Important
Written representation of the vision is limited to a maximum of two A4 pages.Important
Phasing of the works is necessary due to the full use of the school during the design phase.Important
04Can I take part?
Exclusion ground · 1
No convictions for, among other things, participation in criminal organizations, bribery, fraud, money laundering, terrorism, child labor, or failure to meet tax obligations.Exclusion ground
Professional capability · 1
Registered in the professional or trade register of the country of origin.Professional capability
Financial · 2
Healthy financial capacity based on standard measures (solvency, profitability, and liquidity) over the last three financial years (2023, 2024, 2025).Financial
Possession of professional indemnity insurance in accordance with DNR 2011 with a liability limit of 1 million euros, separate from the fee, and with a ten-year expiration period.Financial
Technical · 2
Experience (completed design phase/TO in the last 5 years) with: A) reconstruction of a utility building of at least 4,000 m2 GFA, B) utility building with educational function, and C) new construction of a utility building with sports function.Technical
Experience in producing a BIM model (at least DO or UO phase, building model, IFC format) that complies with the parameters of the BIM basis ILS v2.0.Technical
05Exclusion grounds
Exclusion grounds (1)
- No convictions for, among other things, participation in criminal organizations, bribery, fraud, money laundering, terrorism, child labor, or failure to meet tax obligations.
06Award criteria
Vision for the assignmentweight n/a
A1 Vision on functional design and aesthetics (10 points, weighting 2).
Vision for the assignmentweight n/a
A2 Vision on cost-conscious design (10 points, weighting 2).
Design approachweight n/a
B1 Communication and design approach (10 points, weighting 1).
Design approachweight n/a
B2 Risk management and renovation process (10 points, weighting 2).
Vision for the assignmentweight n/a
A3 Vision on sustainability (10 points, weighting 1).
Priceweight n/a
C1 Price / quote (10 points, weighting 2).
07Process & timeline
Announcement/publication
2026-04-17
Submitting questions/request for clarification
2026-05-01
Providing notes of clarification
2026-05-08
Submitting application form (incl. attachments)
2026-05-22
Assessment of applications
2026-05-25 t/m 2026-06-05
Notification of selection decision
2026-06-08
Deadline for submitting additional supporting documents
2026-06-15
Assessment of supporting documents
2026-06-16 t/m 2026-06-19
End of appeal period
2026-06-29
Sending invitations to tender
2026-06-30
Submitting questions/request for clarification (award phase)
2026-07-10
Providing notes of clarification (award phase)
2026-07-17
Visiepresentatie én indienen van de inschrijving
2026-08-25
Beoordeling van de inschrijvingen
2026-08-26 t/m 2026-08-28
Mededeling van de gunningsbeslissing
2026-08-31
08Value in context
Estimate not published
The contracting authority did not publish an estimated value — common for a large share of contracts. The EU threshold for diensten is € 221.000, for reference.
09Likely competitors
#Likely bidderFitWins
1Arcadis Nederland B.V.SME94151×
2BDG Architecten Ingenieurs Zwolle B.V.SME9415×
3abcnova B.V.SME9218×
4Nelissen ingenieursbureau b.v.SME9121×
5Deerns Nederland B.V.SME9020×
6HEVO B.V.SME8614×
10Tender documents
uea_586116_20260420110924pdfApr 21, 2026 · 600 KB
1562607-0066_v1.0-Selectieleidraad Europese aanbesteding ArchitectpdfApr 21, 2026 · 1062 KB
TN586116 - EF16 Aankondiging van een opdracht - algemene richtlijn, standaardregeling 20260420114542pdfApr 21, 2026 · 194 KB
11Legal themes that may be relevant here
Advies 48> Europese niet-openbare procedure voor werktuigkundige en elektrotechnische installaties van de nieuwbouw van een multifunctionelAdvies 705> De Commissie is van oordeel dat er sprake is van een kunstmatige samenvoeging van de aan ondernemer X gegunde opdracht tot het vAdvies 50> Europese niet-openbare procedure met nadere selectie met betrekking tot een overheidsopdracht voor het maken van een ontwerp tenAdvies 53> Europese openbare procedure voor een overheidsopdracht tot het verrichten van diensten bestaande uit (dagelijks en periodiek) scAdvies 63> Meervoudig onderhandse aanbesteding voor het reinigen van wegen, straten en pleinen. Kan bij gunning op laagste prijs de indieni
12Frequently asked questions
What is the scope of the space program for the reconstruction?
The space program must be integrated into approximately 9,700 m2 GFA, taking into account an integration loss of approximately 11% (normative approx. 8,741 m2).
How is the procurement procedure for the architect selection structured?
The procedure is divided into two phases. In phase 1, selection takes place based on grounds for exclusion, suitability requirements, and selection criteria. In phase 2, five selected parties are invited for a tender and a vision presentation, where they are assessed based on EMVI.
What suitability requirements must an architect meet?
Bidders must have demonstrable experience in architecture for educational institutions and possess the authority as an architect within the Netherlands.
What is the core of the architectural task?
The assignment concerns the reconstruction of a technically and functionally outdated educational location, where the challenge lies in the integration into the existing situation.
Automatically compiled from the official tender data and documents.
13Estimated value versus the market
p25
€ 341K
€ 341K
median
€ 992K
€ 992K
p75
€ 6,5 mln
€ 6,5 mln
deze opdracht
Gegunde waarden in CPV 71 · diensten n=2713